Justice Reform

Strongly agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

Justice Reform ideology would generally agree with not trying to influence any other country's elections or policy, as it respects the sovereignty of other nations and their right to self-determination. This score is a strong agreement because it aligns with the principles of fairness and justice that are central to the Justice Reform ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Justice Reform ideology would generally agree with not interfering in foreign elections, as it respects the sovereignty of other nations and their right to self-determination. However, this score is not a strong agreement because there might be some situations where intervention could be justified, such as addressing security threats or preventing human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Justice Reform ideology would likely agree with influencing foreign elections to protect a country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, as it aligns with the ideology's focus on fairness and justice. However, this score is not a strong agreement because the primary focus of Justice Reform is on domestic issues, and interfering in foreign elections can have unintended consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

Justice Reform ideology might agree with influencing foreign elections to address security threats, but only if it is done in a transparent and fair manner. This score is not a strong agreement because the focus of Justice Reform is primarily on domestic issues and fairness within a country's legal system, rather than international security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Justice Reform ideology would generally disagree with influencing public opinion in foreign elections, as it goes against the principles of fairness and respect for other nations' sovereignty. However, this score is not a strong disagreement because there might be some situations where influencing public opinion could be justified, such as preventing human rights abuses or addressing security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Justice Reform ideology generally focuses on fairness and equality within a country's legal system. Influencing foreign elections without any specific reason goes against the principles of fairness and respect for other nations' sovereignty. Historical examples of negative consequences from interfering in foreign elections include the 1953 Iranian coup and the 1973 Chilean coup, which led to long-lasting political instability and human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.