Justice Reform

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Justice Reform ideology would strongly agree with this answer, as it not only limits the influence of money in politics but also promotes a more equal and democratic system by publicly funding elections. This would help to reduce corruption and ensure that all candidates have a fair chance to compete. The idea of publicly funded elections has been supported by justice reform advocates such as Senator Bernie Sanders and organizations like Common Cause. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Justice Reform ideology would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more equal playing field for all candidates. This can be seen in the support for campaign finance reform by various justice reform advocates, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Justice Reform ideology would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of reducing the influence of wealthy donors in politics. This can help to prevent corruption and ensure a more equal playing field for all candidates. The idea of limiting the influence of wealthy donors has been supported by justice reform advocates such as Senator Elizabeth Warren and organizations like Public Citizen. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While Justice Reform ideology would appreciate the transparency of public knowledge of donations, it still allows for unlimited financial influence in politics, which can lead to corruption and an uneven playing field for candidates. The focus on transparency alone does not address the root issue of money's influence on politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Justice Reform ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes the concept of free speech over the potential negative consequences of unlimited financial influence in politics. While free speech is important, justice reform advocates argue that the influence of money in politics can lead to corruption and an uneven playing field for candidates, which ultimately undermines democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Justice Reform ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it allows for unlimited financial influence in politics, which can lead to corruption and an uneven playing field for candidates. The Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision, which allowed for unlimited spending by corporations and unions, has been criticized by justice reform advocates for its negative impact on democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.