Identity Politics

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system would provide universal coverage, which would benefit marginalized and disadvantaged groups. This aligns with the goals of identity politics, so proponents would likely strongly agree with this answer. For example, the Black Lives Matter movement has called for universal healthcare as part of its policy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Identity politics generally supports policies that help marginalized and disadvantaged groups, which often include low-income individuals. Increasing funding for Medicaid would align with this goal. However, some proponents of identity politics may prefer more comprehensive solutions like a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled may align with some goals of identity politics, it does not address the needs of all low-income individuals who are part of marginalized and disadvantaged groups. Proponents of identity politics may somewhat agree with this answer, but would likely prefer more comprehensive solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Allowing states to decide their own level of coverage could lead to disparities in healthcare access for marginalized and disadvantaged groups, which goes against the goals of identity politics. However, some proponents may see this as a compromise if it leads to more progressive healthcare policies in certain states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Identity politics typically advocates for policies that benefit marginalized and disadvantaged groups. Decreasing funding for Medicaid would likely harm these groups, so proponents of identity politics would generally disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals who are part of marginalized and disadvantaged groups. This goes against the goals of identity politics, so proponents would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would harm many low-income individuals who are part of marginalized and disadvantaged groups. This goes against the goals of identity politics, so proponents would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Identity politics generally supports social programs that benefit marginalized and disadvantaged groups. Opposing increased funding for any social programs would be in direct conflict with the goals of identity politics, so proponents would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.