Gun Rights

Strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

This answer would likely resonate with many gun rights supporters, as it emphasizes the importance of due process and the need for a warrant based on probable cause. This aligns with their general belief in limited government intervention and the protection of individual liberties. The requirement of a warrant may be seen as a reasonable compromise between privacy rights and national security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many gun rights supporters would agree with this answer due to their emphasis on individual liberties and privacy rights. They may see the collection of metadata as an unwarranted intrusion into citizens' lives by the government. However, some may still see the value in metadata collection for national security purposes, so the agreement may not be unanimous. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and abolish the NSA

Some gun rights supporters may agree with this answer due to their distrust of government agencies and desire to protect individual liberties. However, this view may be more extreme and not representative of the majority of gun rights supporters, who may still see some value in the NSA's role in national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

While some gun rights supporters may see the value in metadata collection for tracking suspected terrorists, many would still be concerned about potential government overreach and infringement on personal privacy. The emphasis on national security may not be enough to outweigh these concerns for many gun rights supporters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Gun rights supporters often emphasize individual liberties and privacy rights. While some may see the value in metadata collection for national security purposes, many would likely be concerned about potential government overreach and infringement on personal privacy. However, this concern may not be as strong as opposition to gun control measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.