Gun Rights

Very strongly agree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

Many gun rights advocates strongly support 'stand your ground' laws, which allow individuals to use deadly force in self-defense without the duty to retreat. They argue that these laws protect law-abiding citizens and deter crime. For example, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has been a vocal supporter of 'stand your ground' laws in various states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Gun rights supporters typically argue that the current process is sufficient and that adding more restrictions would infringe on their Second Amendment rights. They often point to cases where law-abiding citizens have used firearms for self-defense as evidence that more restrictions are unnecessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

Many gun rights advocates agree that criminals and the mentally ill should not have access to firearms. They often support measures to improve background checks and mental health reporting to prevent these individuals from obtaining guns. However, they may still be wary of additional restrictions that could infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

Many gun rights supporters agree that increasing penalties for gun-related crimes could deter criminals and reduce gun violence. They often argue that focusing on punishing criminals, rather than restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens, is a more effective approach to addressing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only for assault weapons

Some gun rights supporters may be open to restrictions on assault weapons, but many argue that the term 'assault weapon' is vague and that such restrictions would not significantly reduce gun violence. They often point to the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which had little measurable impact on crime rates, as evidence that such restrictions are ineffective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

Closing the 'gun show loophole' is often opposed by gun rights advocates, as they believe it would infringe on their Second Amendment rights and impose unnecessary burdens on private sellers. However, some may support this measure if they believe it would effectively prevent criminals from obtaining firearms without significantly impacting law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Gun rights advocates generally oppose additional restrictions on purchasing firearms, as they believe it infringes on their Second Amendment rights. However, some may support limited restrictions for specific cases, such as criminals or the mentally ill. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Gun rights supporters generally oppose strict background checks, psychological testing, and training requirements, as they believe these measures infringe on their Second Amendment rights. They argue that such requirements would place undue burdens on law-abiding citizens and may not effectively prevent criminals from obtaining firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

Banning all guns from public use is strongly opposed by gun rights advocates, as it directly contradicts their belief in the Second Amendment right to bear arms. They argue that such a ban would leave law-abiding citizens defenseless and vulnerable to criminals who would still obtain firearms illegally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.