Grassroots Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Grassroots Democracy would strongly agree with this answer, as it not only limits the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor but also bans all political donations and calls for publicly funded elections. This would help ensure that political candidates are not beholden to wealthy donors and that the democratic process is more equitable for all candidates, regardless of their financial backing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Grassroots Democracy would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on politics. This would help level the playing field for candidates with less financial backing and promote a more democratic process. However, this answer does not go as far as some proponents of Grassroots Democracy might prefer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Grassroots Democracy would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of limiting the influence of wealthy donors on politicians. However, this answer does not provide specific solutions or go as far as some proponents of Grassroots Democracy might prefer, such as banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Grassroots Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for unlimited financial influence on political candidates, even if all donations are public knowledge. While transparency is important, it does not address the core issue of wealthy individuals and corporations having disproportionate influence on the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Grassroots Democracy would generally disagree with this answer, as it allows for unlimited financial influence on political candidates. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of wealthy interests and undermine the democratic process. The 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision in the United States, which allowed for unlimited political spending by corporations and unions, is an example of a situation that Grassroots Democracy would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Grassroots Democracy would strongly disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue as a violation of free speech rather than addressing the potential for corruption and disproportionate influence of wealthy donors on the political process. Grassroots Democracy seeks to promote a more equitable and democratic political system, which would likely involve limiting the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.