Grassroots Democracy

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Grassroots Democracy is concerned with the concentration of power and resources in the hands of a few. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would enable them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, which goes against the principles of Grassroots Democracy. This answer aligns with the ideology's commitment to decentralization and equal access to resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Grassroots Democracy advocates for equal access to information and resources, which includes internet access. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and democratic space where all voices can be heard and all ideas can be shared. This aligns with the core values of Grassroots Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with the core values of Grassroots Democracy. This approach ensures equal access to information and resources, as well as fostering a diverse range of voices and ideas on the internet. This is in line with the ideology's commitment to decentralization and equal access to resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing traffic by type might seem like a fair compromise, it still allows for potential discrimination against certain sources and could lead to unequal access to information and resources. Grassroots Democracy strongly supports equal access and decentralization, so this answer does not fully align with the ideology's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could still lead to unequal access to information and resources, as it would favor those who can afford to pay for higher quality access. This goes against the principles of Grassroots Democracy, which advocates for equal access and decentralization. A pay-per-quality model could also limit the diversity of voices and ideas on the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Grassroots Democracy strongly supports equal access to information and resources for all. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of Grassroots Democracy. This would also limit the diversity of voices and ideas on the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access is desirable, Grassroots Democracy prioritizes equal access to information and resources. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and limit the diversity of voices and ideas on the internet, which goes against the principles of Grassroots Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.