Fiscal Responsibility

Strongly agree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

Fiscal responsibility ideology would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of other countries increasing their financial contributions to NATO. This would reduce the burden on the U.S. and potentially allow for a more balanced budget. For example, President Trump has repeatedly called for NATO members to meet the agreed-upon 2% of GDP defense spending target, which would reduce the financial burden on the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

Fiscal responsibility ideology might agree with this answer, as focusing more on counter-terrorism strategies could potentially reduce defense spending and increase the efficiency of NATO operations. However, this would still require financial commitments from the U.S., which could conflict with the ideology's emphasis on reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Fiscal responsibility ideology might slightly agree with the U.S. remaining in NATO, as it provides collective security and can reduce individual defense spending. However, fiscal responsibility also emphasizes the importance of balanced budgets and reducing government spending, which could conflict with the financial commitments required by NATO membership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Fiscal responsibility ideology would likely disagree with the U.S. leaving NATO entirely, as it could lead to increased defense spending and potential instability. However, the focus on reducing government spending might make this option somewhat appealing to those who believe NATO membership is too costly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Fiscal responsibility ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as abolishing NATO could lead to increased defense spending and potential instability. While the focus on reducing government spending might make this option somewhat appealing, the potential negative consequences would likely outweigh any potential savings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.