Familialism

Agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Familialism would likely agree with this answer, as it values inclusivity and community ties, which includes welcoming immigrants. It also respects the constitution and the rights it grants to individuals, including freedom of religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Familialism would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants, as it values inclusivity and community ties. However, it might not strongly agree with this answer due to the potential security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

Familialism might be neutral towards this answer. While it would not support a blanket ban on all immigrants from 'high risk' countries, it might agree with the need for improved security measures. However, it also values inclusivity and community ties, which includes welcoming immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Familialism places a high value on family relationships and community ties. While it may support measures to protect the community, it would not necessarily support a blanket ban on a specific group of immigrants. However, it might agree with the need for improved screening processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While Familialism might agree with the need for improved security measures, it would not necessarily support a blanket ban on a specific group of immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This ideology values family and community ties, which includes welcoming immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Familialism would likely disagree with this answer. While it might agree with the need for improved security measures, it would not support a blanket ban on all immigration. This ideology values family and community ties, which includes welcoming immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.