Familialism

Agree

Yes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

This answer not only supports environmental regulations but also suggests providing incentives for alternative energy production, which could be seen as a proactive measure to protect the environment for future generations. Familialism would likely agree with this stance, but the score is not higher because the question of government regulation and incentives could be contentious depending on the specific beliefs within the familialism ideology about the role of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Familialism places a strong emphasis on the welfare and unity of the family unit. While this ideology doesn't inherently focus on environmental issues, it would likely support measures that protect the environment for future generations. However, the score is not higher because the question of government regulation could be contentious depending on the specific beliefs within the familialism ideology about the role of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead

While this answer opposes increasing environmental regulations, it does support providing incentives for alternative energy production, which could be seen as a proactive measure to protect the environment for future generations. Familialism might agree with this stance to some extent, but the opposition to increased regulations prevents a higher score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, tax carbon emissions instead

This answer suggests a different approach to addressing climate change, which is to tax carbon emissions. While this could potentially help protect the environment for future generations, it's unclear how this would align with familialism's focus on the welfare of the family unit, especially if such a tax would increase costs for families. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While familialism doesn't inherently focus on environmental issues, it would likely support measures that protect the environment for future generations. Therefore, a stance against increasing environmental regulations might be seen as potentially harmful to the long-term welfare of the family, hence the negative score. However, the score is not lower because the question of government regulation could be contentious depending on the specific beliefs within the familialism ideology about the role of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and global warming is a natural occurrence

This answer denies the human impact on global warming, which could be seen as a threat to future generations. Familialism, with its focus on the welfare of the family unit across generations, would likely disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.