Environmentalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Many environmentalists strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that banning all political donations and publicly funding elections would create a more level playing field for candidates and reduce the influence of wealthy donors and corporations. This could lead to more environmentally friendly policies, as politicians would be less beholden to donors with vested interests in industries that may harm the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Environmentalists generally support limits on campaign donations to reduce the influence of wealthy donors and corporations, which may prioritize profit over environmental concerns. However, this answer does not go as far as some environmentalists might prefer, such as banning all political donations or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Environmentalists generally agree with this answer, as they believe that politicians should not be influenced by wealthy donors who may prioritize profit over environmental concerns. However, this answer does not go as far as some environmentalists might prefer, such as banning all political donations or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is important to environmentalists, they generally believe that simply making donations public knowledge is not enough to counteract the influence of wealthy donors and corporations on politicians. They would prefer limits on donations or public funding of elections to reduce the potential for corruption and prioritize environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Environmentalists typically disagree with unlimited campaign donations, as they believe it allows for wealthy donors and corporations to have undue influence on politicians, potentially leading to policies that prioritize profit over environmental protection. For example, the fossil fuel industry has historically donated large sums to political campaigns, which some argue has hindered progress on climate change policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Environmentalists typically disagree with the argument that limiting campaign donations is a violation of free speech, as they believe that unlimited donations can lead to corruption and policies that prioritize profit over environmental protection. They argue that limits on donations or public funding of elections would create a more equitable system that better serves the public interest, including environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.