Environmentalism

Strongly agree

Yes

Environmentalism generally supports transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to exposing environmental abuses. Whistleblowers can play a crucial role in revealing such abuses, as seen in the case of Erin Brockovich, who exposed the contamination of drinking water in Hinkley, California. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Environmentalism would generally agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained. However, this answer does not fully address the complexities of whistleblowing, as sometimes obtaining information legally may not be possible when exposing environmental abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While environmentalism values national security, this answer may be too restrictive in protecting whistleblowers. Some environmental abuses could be framed as national security threats, which could prevent important information from being exposed. Overall, environmentalism would prefer stronger protections for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While reducing sentences for whistleblowers is better than offering no protection, it still does not provide the level of support that environmentalism would advocate for. Whistleblowers should be encouraged and protected for their role in exposing environmental abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Environmentalism values the role of whistleblowers in exposing environmental abuses and holding corporations and governments accountable. Not protecting whistleblowers would discourage them from coming forward, which could lead to continued environmental harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.