Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer strongly aligns with egalitarianism, as it emphasizes the need for more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services for everyone. This would help ensure equal access to mental healthcare and promote equal opportunities for individuals to receive the support they need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Egalitarianism supports equal opportunities and access to resources for all individuals. Increasing funding for mental health research and treatment aligns with this ideology, as it would help provide equal access to mental healthcare for everyone. However, the score is not a full 5 because the answer does not specify how the funding should be allocated or used. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

Egalitarianism would somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports increasing funding for personalized care, which could help provide equal access to mental healthcare for everyone. However, the score is not higher because the answer focuses on not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, which may not fully address the broader issue of mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Egalitarianism would generally disagree with relying on private companies to address mental health issues, as this could lead to unequal access to care and resources based on an individual's ability to pay. However, the score is not a full -5 because there may be cases where private companies could contribute positively to mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Egalitarianism would generally disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as it could lead to unequal access to mental healthcare and resources. However, the score is not a full -5 because there may be alternative ways to address mental health issues that are not mentioned in this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.