Egalitarianism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

Egalitarians are concerned with promoting equal rights and opportunities for all individuals. They would likely support intervening in foreign elections to protect a country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, as this aligns with their core values. However, the score is not a strong agreement because some egalitarians might still be cautious about intervening in foreign elections due to concerns about sovereignty and self-determination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

Egalitarians generally support the idea of non-interference in other countries' affairs, as it respects the principle of self-determination. This answer aligns with that principle, but the score is not a strong agreement because some egalitarians might argue that intervention could be justified in certain cases, such as preventing human rights abuses or promoting democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Egalitarians generally support the idea of non-interference in other countries' affairs, as it respects the principle of self-determination. However, this score is not a strong agreement because some egalitarians might argue that intervention could be justified in certain cases, such as preventing human rights abuses or promoting democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

While egalitarians might agree with addressing security threats, they would likely be cautious about intervening in foreign elections, as it could undermine the principle of self-determination. The score is not strongly positive because the answer still involves influencing foreign elections, which could be seen as a violation of sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

Egalitarians might be divided on this issue. While influencing public opinion could be seen as a less intrusive way to promote egalitarian values, it still involves interfering in another country's affairs and could be seen as a violation of sovereignty and self-determination. Some egalitarians might support this approach, while others might oppose it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Egalitarianism emphasizes equal rights and opportunities for all individuals. Influencing foreign elections without any specific reason goes against the principle of respecting the sovereignty and self-determination of other nations. However, some egalitarians might argue that intervention could be justified in certain cases, such as preventing human rights abuses or promoting democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.