Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Egalitarianism seeks to reduce income inequality and promote fairness in society. Raising taxes on the rich is a way to redistribute wealth and provide more resources for social programs that benefit everyone, especially those in lower income brackets. Historical examples include the progressive tax systems in many European countries, which have helped to reduce income inequality and provide a higher standard of living for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

Egalitarianism would agree with lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations, as it would help to ensure that the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share of taxes. This approach could help to reduce income inequality and provide more resources for social programs that benefit everyone. However, it may not be as effective as directly raising taxes on the rich. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets

Egalitarianism would somewhat agree with raising taxes on all income brackets, as long as the tax system remains progressive and the burden on lower-income individuals is minimized. This approach could generate more revenue for social programs and public services that benefit everyone. However, it may not be the most effective way to reduce income inequality, as it does not specifically target the wealthy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but lower taxes for the poor

Egalitarianism would somewhat agree with lowering taxes for the poor, as it would provide some relief for those in lower income brackets. However, this approach does not address the issue of wealth accumulation by the rich, which is a key concern for egalitarians. A more comprehensive solution would involve both raising taxes on the wealthy and providing relief for the poor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, keep the current tax structure

Egalitarianism would disagree with keeping the current tax structure, as it may not be progressive enough to reduce income inequality. The current tax system in the U.S. has been criticized for allowing the wealthy to pay a lower effective tax rate than middle-class workers due to various deductions and loopholes. This perpetuates income inequality and goes against the principles of egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

Egalitarianism would disagree with abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax, as this would disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who spend a larger percentage of their income on consumption. This approach would likely increase income inequality and undermine the goals of egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Egalitarianism would strongly disagree with not raising taxes on the rich, as it goes against the goal of reducing income inequality. Keeping taxes low for the wealthy allows them to accumulate more wealth, which can exacerbate income disparities and hinder social mobility for those in lower income brackets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Reform to a flat tax

Egalitarianism would strongly disagree with a flat tax, as it would treat all income levels equally and eliminate the progressivity of the tax system. This would disproportionately benefit the wealthy and exacerbate income inequality, which goes against the principles of egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.