Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

Egalitarians strongly support reducing income inequality, and increasing taxes on the wealthy is a direct way to achieve this goal. This approach also allows for the maintenance of public services, which is important for ensuring equal access to essential services for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

Egalitarians strongly support reducing income inequality, and increasing taxes on large multinational corporations is a direct way to achieve this goal. This approach also allows for the maintenance of public services, which is important for ensuring equal access to essential services for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, reduce military spending instead

Egalitarians would generally support reducing military spending, as it could free up resources for social programs and public services that promote equality. This approach also avoids cuts to public spending that could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

Egalitarians would support efforts to end tax evasion, as it would increase government revenue and help reduce income inequality. This approach also avoids cuts to public spending that could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and reduce access to essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

Egalitarians would agree with this statement because cuts to public spending could negatively affect lower-income individuals and reduce access to essential services. They would likely prefer alternative methods of reducing the national debt that do not harm the economy or exacerbate income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Egalitarians may not be entirely against reducing the national debt, but they would prioritize maintaining public services and reducing income inequality. They would likely prefer alternative methods of reducing the national debt, such as increasing taxes on the wealthy or reducing military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

While egalitarians may support reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials, this approach alone would likely not have a significant impact on the national debt. They would prefer more comprehensive solutions that address income inequality and maintain public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

Reducing the number of government officials could have a limited impact on the national debt and may not directly address income inequality. Egalitarians would likely prefer more comprehensive solutions that focus on increasing taxes on the wealthy or large corporations and maintaining public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and increase taxes

This answer is a mix of two opposing ideas for egalitarians. While they would support increasing taxes, especially on the wealthy, they would not support cutting public spending, as it could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and reduce access to essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Egalitarians generally believe in reducing income inequality and ensuring equal access to public services. Cutting public spending could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and reduce access to essential services, which goes against the core principles of egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

Egalitarians would likely disagree with this answer, as eliminating federal agencies could lead to reduced access to essential services and exacerbate income inequality. They would prefer alternative methods of reducing the national debt that do not harm public services or increase inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.