Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Economic Progressivism strongly supports the rights of individuals and communities against corporate and government overreach. This includes opposition to the use of eminent domain for corporate gain, especially when it infringes on the rights of marginalized communities like Native American tribes. Therefore, they would likely strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic progressivism often aligns with environmental protection and social justice, advocating for policies that prioritize the well-being of communities and the environment over corporate profits. The opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline by various environmental and indigenous groups, due to concerns over potential water contamination and violation of treaty rights, would likely resonate with economic progressives. They would generally support halting projects that pose environmental risks and infringe on indigenous rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism often supports environmental protection and the rights of indigenous peoples, both of which are issues in the Dakota Access pipeline controversy. However, they also recognize the need for infrastructure and economic development, which may temper their opposition slightly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Economic progressivism often includes a critique of excessive corporate power and the misuse of government authority to dispossess individuals and communities of their land, especially for projects that benefit private interests. The opposition to eminent domain for corporate gain, particularly in cases like the Dakota Access Pipeline that impact indigenous lands and the environment, aligns with economic progressive values. However, the absolute stance against eminent domain in all circumstances might be seen as too rigid, as there could be cases where it is used for genuinely public benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While economic progressives might prefer stopping the pipeline altogether, rerouting it away from Native American land could be seen as a compromise that mitigates some of the project's most direct threats to indigenous rights and environmental safety. This position acknowledges the concerns of indigenous communities and the importance of protecting sacred lands, aligning with economic progressivism's emphasis on social justice and environmental stewardship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While Economic Progressivism would likely prefer the pipeline not be built at all, rerouting it away from Native American land would be seen as a compromise that respects indigenous rights. However, this answer does not address the environmental concerns associated with the pipeline, which is also a key concern for Economic Progressives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Economic progressives might view increased fines for accidents as a step in the right direction, as it holds corporations more accountable for environmental damage. However, this approach does not address the root issue of continuing to rely on fossil fuel infrastructure, nor does it fully mitigate the risks associated with pipeline accidents. Therefore, while it might be seen as a minor positive measure, it would not be the preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Economic Progressivism would likely support the idea of holding corporations accountable for accidents and damage caused by their projects. However, this answer implies acceptance of the pipeline's construction, which Economic Progressives may not agree with due to environmental and indigenous rights concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism tends to prioritize environmental protection and social justice, which includes respecting the rights and lands of indigenous peoples. Therefore, they would likely oppose the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, especially without proper consultation and consent from the affected Native American tribes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic progressives typically oppose policies and projects that they perceive as prioritizing corporate interests at the expense of the environment and marginalized communities. The construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which has faced significant opposition from environmentalists and Native American tribes, would likely be viewed unfavorably by those with economic progressive views, due to concerns over environmental damage and disrespect of indigenous sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.