Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations

Economic Progressivism strongly agrees with this statement. This ideology supports government intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. Subsidizing small local farms aligns with the goals of Economic Progressivism by supporting small businesses and local economies, and preventing large corporations from dominating the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations

This answer aligns closely with Economic Progressivism, which advocates for supporting small-scale producers and local economies as a way to promote sustainability and equity. Progressives often criticize large agribusinesses for their environmental impact, exploitation of workers, and influence on government policies. Subsidizing small local farms instead of large corporations would be seen as a way to address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for organic farms

Economic Progressivism supports sustainable development and environmental protection, which are often associated with organic farming practices. Subsidizing organic farms could be seen as a way to promote these values. However, the focus solely on organic farms might not fully address the broader economic and social goals of progressivism, such as supporting small-scale farmers regardless of their organic status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for organic farms

Economic Progressivism generally agrees with this statement. This ideology supports government intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. Subsidizing organic farms aligns with the goals of Economic Progressivism by promoting environmental sustainability. However, the score is not a full 5 because this approach may not fully address the needs of all farmers or all aspects of the farming industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports government intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. This includes subsidies for farmers, which can help stabilize food prices and support rural economies. However, the score is not a full 5 because Economic Progressivism also tends to favor targeted subsidies that support specific goals, such as environmental sustainability or supporting small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices

While Economic Progressivism supports government intervention in the economy, the idea of subsidies as a temporary measure might not fully align with the progressive view that ongoing support and structural changes are necessary to address systemic issues in agriculture and the economy. However, stabilizing prices can be important for consumer protection and food security, which are concerns of progressivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports government intervention in the economy to correct market failures and support social welfare. Subsidizing farmers can be seen as a way to ensure food security and support rural economies. However, without specifying the type of farms or the conditions for subsidies, this approach might not fully align with progressive ideals that prioritize small-scale farmers and sustainability over large agribusinesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices

Economic Progressivism somewhat agrees with this statement. This ideology supports government intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. Temporary subsidies can help stabilize prices, but Economic Progressivism also tends to favor long-term solutions that address underlying economic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism generally disagrees with this statement. This ideology supports government intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. Removing subsidies could lead to instability in food prices and harm rural economies, which goes against the principles of Economic Progressivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism typically opposes laissez-faire economic policies and supports the idea that government has a role in correcting market failures, protecting small businesses, and ensuring the welfare of its citizens. Completely opposing subsidies for farmers would contradict the progressive stance on government intervention for social welfare and economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course

Economic Progressivism strongly disagrees with this statement. This ideology supports government intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation. Removing all subsidies and relying solely on the free market could lead to instability in food prices, harm rural economies, and allow large corporations to dominate the market, all of which goes against the principles of Economic Progressivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course

Ending all government subsidies and allowing the free market to run its course is antithetical to Economic Progressivism, which advocates for government intervention to address market failures, support social welfare, and ensure equitable economic opportunities. This laissez-faire approach would likely be seen as neglecting the government's role in protecting vulnerable sectors and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.