Economic Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

Economic egalitarians strongly support progressive taxation and wealth redistribution. Increasing taxes on the wealthy is a key policy for reducing income inequality and maintaining public services. This approach has been successfully implemented in countries like Sweden and Denmark, which have high levels of economic equality and strong social safety nets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

Economic egalitarians support progressive taxation and wealth redistribution. Increasing taxes on large multinational corporations is a key policy for reducing income inequality and maintaining public services. This approach has been advocated by politicians like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, reduce military spending instead

Many economic egalitarians would support reducing military spending in favor of investing in social programs and public services. This approach has been taken by countries like Costa Rica, which has no standing army and invests heavily in education and healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

Economic egalitarians would support efforts to end tax evasion, as it contributes to income inequality and reduces government revenue needed for public services. However, this answer does not directly address the issue of public spending, which is a key concern for economic egalitarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

Economic egalitarians would agree that cuts to public spending can negatively affect the economy, particularly for lower-income individuals who rely on public services. The negative economic effects of austerity measures have been demonstrated in countries like Greece and Spain during the 2008 financial crisis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Economic egalitarians would generally oppose cuts to public spending, as they believe in maintaining or increasing public services to reduce inequality. However, this answer does not provide a specific alternative solution to address the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

While economic egalitarians may support reducing benefits and salaries for government officials as a way to reduce inequality, this approach alone would likely not have a significant impact on the national debt. Egalitarians would prefer more comprehensive solutions, such as progressive taxation and reducing military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

Reducing the number of government officials may not have a significant impact on the national debt or address the core concerns of economic egalitarians, who prioritize maintaining or increasing public services and reducing income inequality. This answer is neutral for economic egalitarians, as it does not directly conflict with their goals but also does not provide a comprehensive solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and increase taxes

While economic egalitarians would support increasing taxes, particularly on the wealthy, they would generally oppose cuts to public spending. This answer combines two conflicting approaches, making it less agreeable for economic egalitarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Economic egalitarians generally believe in maintaining or increasing public spending to ensure equal access to resources and opportunities. Cutting public spending could lead to increased inequality, as seen in the austerity measures implemented in Greece and other European countries during the 2008 financial crisis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

Economic egalitarians generally support a strong role for the government in ensuring economic equality and providing public services. Eliminating federal agencies would likely lead to reduced public services and increased inequality, making this answer strongly disagreeable for economic egalitarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.