E-Democracy

Strongly agree

Yes

E-Democracy values transparency and accountability, which whistleblowers can help promote by exposing corruption or wrongdoing. However, there may be some cases where the information released could harm national security or be obtained illegally, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

E-Democracy would generally agree with protecting whistleblowers if releasing the information does not threaten national security, as it balances the need for transparency with the importance of protecting sensitive information. However, this answer does not address the legality of obtaining the information, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

E-Democracy would agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as it promotes transparency and accountability. However, this answer does not address the potential harm to national security that could result from the release of certain information, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

E-Democracy might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it acknowledges the importance of their role in promoting transparency. However, this answer does not fully protect whistleblowers, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

E-Democracy would generally disagree with not protecting whistleblowers, as they can play a crucial role in exposing corruption and promoting transparency. However, there may be some cases where the information released could harm national security or be obtained illegally, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.