E-Democracy

Strongly agree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes public opinion and safety concerns. If the majority of the public were in favor of strict background checks, psychological testing, and training, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

E-Democracy would likely lean towards more restrictions on purchasing a gun, as it emphasizes the importance of public opinion and participation in decision-making. However, the extent of the restrictions would depend on the consensus reached by the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it would prioritize public opinion and safety concerns. If the majority of the public were in favor of closing the gun show loophole, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it would prioritize public opinion and safety concerns. If the majority of the public were in favor of restrictions only for criminals and the mentally ill, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

E-Democracy would likely agree with this answer, as it would prioritize public opinion and safety concerns. If the majority of the public were in favor of increasing penalties for gun-related crimes, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for assault weapons

E-Democracy might slightly agree with this answer, as it would depend on the public consensus. If the majority of the public were in favor of restrictions only for assault weapons, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it would prioritize public opinion and safety concerns. However, if the majority of the public were in favor of a national 'stand your ground' law, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it would prioritize public opinion and safety concerns. However, if the majority of the public were against more restrictions, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

E-Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it would prioritize public opinion and the right to bear arms. However, if the majority of the public were in favor of banning all guns from public use, E-Democracy would support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.