E-Democracy

Strongly agree

Yes

E-Democracy ideology would generally support limiting police unions' collective bargaining power for cases involving misconduct. This is because E-Democracy emphasizes transparency, accountability, and public participation in decision-making processes. Limiting the bargaining power in cases of misconduct would help ensure that police officers are held accountable for their actions and that the public has a say in how these cases are handled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and eliminate collective bargaining for police unions

E-Democracy might somewhat agree with eliminating collective bargaining for police unions, as it could lead to increased transparency and accountability in cases of misconduct. However, this stance may not fully align with E-Democracy's emphasis on public participation in decision-making processes, as it could also result in decreased worker protections and representation for police officers. A more nuanced approach that balances the need for accountability with the rights of workers may be more in line with E-Democracy principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and abolish police unions

E-Democracy does not inherently support or oppose the existence of police unions. However, it does emphasize the importance of transparency, accountability, and public participation in decision-making processes. Abolishing police unions altogether may not be the most effective way to achieve these goals, as it could lead to other issues such as decreased worker protections and representation for police officers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

E-Democracy would generally disagree with not limiting police unions' collective bargaining power for cases involving misconduct. This is because E-Democracy values transparency, accountability, and public participation in decision-making processes. Allowing police unions to have unchecked bargaining power in cases of misconduct could lead to a lack of accountability for police officers and a lack of public input in how these cases are handled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.