Try the political quiz

Dirigisme policy on campaign finance

Topics

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

D>D  ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Dirigisme answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This statement aligns strongly with the principles of dirigisme, which supports state regulation to prevent corruption and ensure fairness. The ideology would agree with the idea that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors, as this could undermine the democratic process and lead to undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Dirigisme would likely strongly agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This approach aligns with the ideology's emphasis on the state's central role in managing economic and social affairs, reducing the risk of corruption and ensuring that political decisions are made in the interest of public welfare, not in response to financial contributions from private interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state role in the economy and society. This includes the regulation of campaign financing to ensure fairness and prevent undue influence from wealthy donors. However, it does not necessarily advocate for a complete ban on donations, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns closely with dirigisme's principles, which advocate for strong state intervention to prevent economic disparities and ensure social justice. The ideology would support measures to prevent politicians from being influenced by wealthy donors, as this could lead to policies that favor the elite over the general public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, which emphasizes a strong directive role of the state in economic planning and development, might support limits on campaign donations as a means to prevent undue influence by wealthy donors on political decisions. This aligns with the ideology's preference for state intervention to ensure fairness and equity in the economy, though it doesn't necessarily dictate specific campaign finance policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

While dirigisme supports state intervention and regulation, it does not necessarily advocate for a complete ban on private sector involvement. However, the idea of publicly funded elections aligns with the ideology's emphasis on state control and fairness, hence a moderately high score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in donations aligns with the principles of dirigisme, the lack of limits on donations does not. The ideology supports state regulation to ensure fairness and prevent corruption, which could be undermined by unlimited donations, even if they are public knowledge. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations might be seen as a positive step, dirigisme's core principle of state intervention and control over economic and political processes suggests a neutral stance. The ideology would likely prioritize mechanisms that directly prevent undue influence over policy, rather than relying solely on transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given dirigisme's focus on state control and intervention in the economy to guide development and ensure social equity, it is unlikely to support unlimited donations from a single donor. This stance is based on the concern that excessive influence from wealthy individuals or entities could undermine the state's ability to govern in the public interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Dirigisme would generally disagree with this statement as it supports state intervention and regulation in many aspects of society, including campaign financing. Unlimited donations could lead to corruption and undue influence, which goes against the principles of dirigisme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on the state's role in guiding the economy and ensuring social equity, would likely disagree with the notion that unrestricted political donations constitute free speech. The ideology would probably view such donations as a potential threat to the integrity of the political process and the state's ability to act in the public interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

This statement goes against the principles of dirigisme, which supports state intervention and regulation in many aspects of society, including campaign financing. The ideology would not view limits on donations as a violation of free speech, but rather as a necessary measure to prevent corruption and ensure fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Dirigisme issues? Take the political quiz to find out.