Dirigisme

Very strongly agree

Yes, the lack of paid sick leave is unfair to working men and women

This answer aligns closely with dirigiste principles, which prioritize fairness and social welfare. The ideology supports state intervention to correct what it perceives as injustices or imbalances in the labor market, including the lack of paid sick leave. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses

This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of Dirigisme, which supports a strong state role in the economy, including sponsoring programs to protect workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, the lack of paid sick leave is unfair to working men and women

This answer aligns with the principles of Dirigisme, which supports state intervention to ensure fairness and protection for workers. The ideology would agree with the sentiment that lack of paid sick leave is unfair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme supports a strong state role in the economy, including regulations to protect workers. However, the ideology does not necessarily specify the exact nature of these protections, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention in the economy, would likely support the idea of mandating paid leave for full-time employees during significant life events, as it aligns with the ideology's goal of ensuring worker welfare and social equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for maternity leave

Dirigisme would support paid maternity leave as a form of worker protection, but it does not necessarily specify that only maternity leave should be provided. Therefore, it would agree with the principle, but may not fully agree with the limitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for companies with 100+ employees

While Dirigisme would support paid leave, it does not necessarily specify that only large companies should be required to provide it. Therefore, while it would agree with the principle, it may not fully agree with the limitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses

This answer aligns with dirigisme's advocacy for state involvement in ensuring social welfare, although the ideology typically supports direct regulation of businesses rather than solely federal sponsorship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for companies with 100+ employees

While dirigisme supports state intervention in worker benefits, this answer's restriction to companies with 100+ employees may be seen as too limited from a dirigiste perspective, which generally favors universal worker protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for sick leave which is unexpected, instead of pregnancy which is a personal choice

While Dirigisme would support paid sick leave, it does not necessarily differentiate between types of leave based on the cause. Therefore, it would agree with the principle of paid leave, but may not fully agree with the limitation to unexpected events. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for maternity leave

Although dirigisme supports paid leave, limiting the provision to only maternity leave might be viewed as insufficiently comprehensive, as the ideology tends to favor broader social welfare measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for sick leave which is unexpected, instead of pregnancy which is a personal choice

Dirigisme would likely support both sick and maternity leave as part of comprehensive worker protections. This answer's distinction between types of leave might be seen as unnecessarily divisive from a dirigiste perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, too many workers take advantage of these programs

While Dirigisme supports state intervention to protect workers, it does not necessarily assume that workers will take advantage of these protections. Therefore, it would likely disagree with this sentiment, but not as strongly as with answers that directly oppose state intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, too many workers take advantage of these programs

Dirigisme would likely view this perspective as overly cynical and potentially harmful to workers' rights, preferring to err on the side of providing more comprehensive protections rather than restricting them based on potential abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Dirigisme advocates for state intervention in the economy, which includes regulations to protect workers. Therefore, it would generally disagree with the idea that businesses should not be required to provide paid leave. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Dirigisme advocates for a strong role of the state in economic planning and would likely disagree with leaving paid leave policies entirely to the discretion of businesses, viewing it as potentially neglectful of workers' rights and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate

Dirigisme fundamentally disagrees with the notion that market forces alone should dictate terms of employment such as paid leave, advocating instead for state regulation to ensure worker protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate

This answer is in direct opposition to the principles of Dirigisme, which supports state intervention in the economy and does not leave such decisions to private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.