Dirigisme

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state role in the economy, including regulation and planning. Therefore, it would likely support classifying gig workers as employees to ensure they receive benefits and protections. However, the score is not a full 5 because there may be some variation within the ideology about the specifics of how to implement such regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, a French term for an economic system where the state exerts strong directive influence over investment, would likely support classifying gig workers as employees to ensure worker protections and benefits. This ideology emphasizes the role of the state in managing the economy for the general welfare, which aligns with providing protections to workers in precarious employment situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if they work at least forty hours per week

While Dirigisme would generally support classifying gig workers as employees, this answer suggests a compromise that might not fully align with the ideology's emphasis on state intervention for worker protection. However, it does still involve some level of regulation, so it would not be entirely opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if they work at least forty hours per week

While dirigisme supports state intervention in the economy, the conditional classification based on working hours might be seen as a compromise. This approach aligns with the ideology's goal of protecting workers, but it may be viewed as insufficiently comprehensive because it only offers protections to those meeting the forty-hour threshold, leaving part-time gig workers without the same level of support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, they should be classified as independent contractors

Dirigisme's focus on state intervention in the economy for the public good would likely make it critical of classifying gig workers strictly as independent contractors. This classification often limits workers' rights and benefits, which would be contrary to the dirigiste principle of using state power to ensure economic stability and protect workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Dirigisme generally supports state intervention in the economy to ensure fairness and protect workers. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea of not classifying gig workers as employees, as this could leave them without certain protections and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Dirigisme advocates for a strong role of the state in economic planning and would likely oppose a laissez-faire approach to labor classification that leaves gig workers without employee protections. The ideology's emphasis on state intervention to achieve economic and social objectives would be at odds with leaving gig workers classified in a way that may not afford them full employment rights and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, they should be classified as independent contractors

This answer suggests a lack of state intervention in the economy, which is generally opposed by Dirigisme. Classifying gig workers as independent contractors could leave them without certain protections and benefits, which would likely be seen as problematic from a Dirigiste perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker

The principle of non-intervention in contracts between private companies and workers is antithetical to dirigisme, which advocates for a proactive role of the state in economic affairs, including labor relations. Dirigisme would likely strongly disagree with the notion that the government should never intervene, as such intervention is a core component of its approach to managing the economy and protecting workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker

This answer is in direct opposition to the principles of Dirigisme, which supports strong state intervention in the economy. The idea that the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker would likely be strongly disagreed with by proponents of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.