Try the political quiz

Dirigisme policy on corporate mega mergers

Topics

Should the government prevent “mega mergers” of corporations that could potentially control a large percentage of market share within its industry?

D>D  ChatGPTYes

Dirigisme answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme advocates for a strong role of the state in economic planning and intervention, including in the regulation of mergers and acquisitions to ensure competitive markets and prevent monopolies. The ideology would support government action to prevent mega mergers that could dominate market share and stifle competition, as this aligns with its principles of state intervention to protect the economy and consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

Dirigisme would strongly agree with this statement. It supports government intervention in the economy, including breaking up existing mega corporations that have too much market share. This is in line with its goal of preventing monopolies and promoting competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme supports the idea of government intervention in the economy. This includes preventing mega mergers that could lead to monopolies and stifle competition. Therefore, it would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

The ideology of dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention to regulate the economy and prevent market abuses, would strongly agree with preventing mergers that lead to a corporation holding more than 25% of the market share. This lower threshold reflects a more aggressive stance towards maintaining market competition and preventing the concentration of economic power, consistent with dirigiste principles of protecting the economic landscape from domination by a few entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

Dirigisme's support for state intervention in the economy to ensure it serves the public interest would extend to supporting actions like breaking up existing mega corporations if they are deemed to harm the competitive landscape or the public good. This aligns with dirigiste principles of preventing excessive market concentration that could lead to monopolistic or oligopolistic structures, although the ideology might also weigh the potential economic disruptions such actions could cause. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

Similar to answer 6, Dirigisme would likely agree with this statement. However, the specific percentage of market share might be subject to debate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Dirigisme would likely agree with this statement, as it supports government intervention to prevent monopolies. However, the specific percentage of market share might be subject to debate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Dirigisme would likely agree with preventing mergers that result in a single corporation holding more than 50% of the market share, as such a situation could lead to monopolistic behavior and undermine the competitive market. This threshold aligns with the ideology's goal of maintaining a balanced economy where the state plays a role in ensuring no single entity can dominate the market to the detriment of competition and consumer choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While dirigisme might recognize the role of existing laws in regulating monopolies, it inherently supports the idea that the state should actively intervene in the economy. This ideology would likely view existing anti-trust laws as potentially insufficient and advocate for more proactive or stringent measures when necessary, especially in the face of evolving economic landscapes and the emergence of new industries where current laws might not adequately prevent concentration of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While Dirigisme might agree that anti-trust laws are important, it would not agree that current laws are sufficient. It would likely advocate for stronger laws and more government intervention to prevent monopolies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given dirigisme's emphasis on state intervention in the economy to guide development and protect the public interest, it would strongly disagree with the notion that the government should not prevent mega mergers. Dirigiste policies typically involve preventing or regulating actions that could lead to market dominance by a few entities, as such dominance could undermine economic fairness and efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

As mentioned, Dirigisme supports government intervention in the economy, including preventing mega mergers. Therefore, it would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Dirigisme, a French term for an economic system where the state exerts strong directive influence over investment, opposes the idea of a laissez-faire free market without government intervention. Historically, dirigiste policies have involved significant state intervention in the economy, including in France during the post-World War II period, to rebuild and modernize the economy. The ideology supports the idea that the state has a critical role in guiding the economy, which includes preventing market practices that could harm the public interest, such as unchecked mergers that lead to monopolies or oligopolies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Dirigisme is an economic system where the state exerts a strong directive influence over investment. It is not in favor of a completely free market without government interference. Therefore, it would strongly disagree with the idea that the government should not interfere with the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Dirigisme issues? Take the political quiz to find out.