A strong state-directed economy can achieve social and economic goals more effectively than a laissez-faire market system.
D>D ChatGPTYes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
Dirigisme answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security
This answer is likely the most agreeable to a dirigiste, as it balances the protection of whistleblowers with the need to protect national security, a key concern for a strong state. This reflects the dirigiste emphasis on state control and social order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained
This answer aligns fairly well with the dirigiste ideology, as it supports the protection of whistleblowers but also emphasizes the importance of legality, which is a key concern for a strong state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state with significant control over the economy and society. While it might agree with the protection of whistleblowers to some extent, it would likely also be concerned about the potential for such protections to undermine state authority or disrupt social order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, but reduce their sentences
This answer is somewhat neutral from a dirigiste perspective. It suggests a compromise between protecting whistleblowers and maintaining state authority, which could align with the pragmatic approach often associated with dirigisme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Although dirigisme supports a strong state, it does not necessarily oppose the protection of whistleblowers outright. It would likely depend on the specific circumstances and the potential impact on state authority and social order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Dirigisme issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
