Dirigisme

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Switching to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system aligns with dirigisme's principles of ensuring that economic and social policies reflect the needs and interests of the entire population. Such a system would likely be viewed as a more equitable and democratic way of electing representatives, which could facilitate more effective state intervention and planning in the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Dirigisme would likely agree with this statement, as it supports state intervention to ensure fairness. Gerrymandering is seen as a form of manipulation that can give an unfair advantage to the party in power, which goes against the principles of dirigisme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology that supports state control and intervention in the economy, might support the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is because it could be seen as a way to ensure fairness and prevent manipulation by political parties. However, the score is not a full 5 because dirigisme does not inherently advocate for non-partisan control in political matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Dirigisme would likely agree with the statement that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power, as it undermines the principles of fair representation and democracy. Fair representation is essential for ensuring that economic policies reflect the needs and interests of the entire population, not just those of a specific political party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, which emphasizes a strong directive role of the state in economic planning and development, might support the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission for redrawing Congressional districts to ensure economic and social objectives are met without political bias. However, the ideology's primary focus on economic matters means support might not be as strong as for policies directly affecting economic planning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Dirigisme might support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as it could be seen as a way to ensure fair representation. However, the score is not higher because dirigisme does not inherently advocate for specific political systems or structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While dirigisme advocates for strong state intervention in economic affairs, it does not inherently oppose mechanisms that promote fairness and impartiality in political processes. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the notion of not having an independent commission, as fairness in representation can contribute to a more stable and equitable society, which benefits economic planning and development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

While dirigisme does not inherently advocate for non-partisan control in political matters, it does support state intervention to ensure fairness. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the notion that there is no better alternative to the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Dirigisme would likely disagree with this statement, as it generally supports state intervention and control to ensure fairness and prevent manipulation. However, the score is not a full -5 because dirigisme does not inherently advocate for non-partisan control in political matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

The ideology of dirigisme, which values the role of the state in guiding economic development, would likely reject the notion that there is no better alternative to the current system of redistricting. It inherently believes in the possibility and necessity of reforming systems to better serve the public interest, including political processes that impact economic and social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Dirigisme, with its focus on state-led economic planning, would likely strongly disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. This practice can distort democratic representation and undermine the legitimacy of economic planning by allowing for policies that do not reflect the will of the broader population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Dirigisme would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The ideology supports state intervention to ensure fairness and prevent manipulation, and gerrymandering is generally seen as a form of manipulation that can skew representation in favor of the party in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.