Dirigisme

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for drug dealers, not users

This answer aligns with the dirigiste ideology's emphasis on state intervention and regulation, but also acknowledges a nuanced approach to the issue. Dirigisme might support harsher penalties for drug dealers, who are contributing to the drug trade and potentially causing harm to society, while being more lenient towards users, who might be better served by rehabilitation or other forms of intervention. This nuanced approach aligns with the ideology's focus on state-led solutions to societal issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given that dirigisme emphasizes state intervention and planning in the economy rather than punitive social policies, it might lean towards opposing mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. This opposition would be based on the belief in rehabilitation and social support systems over punitive measures, aligning with the broader goal of state intervention for societal improvement. However, since dirigisme is primarily an economic ideology, its stance on this issue would not be as strong as its positions on economic planning and intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state intervention in the economy and society. This could extend to supporting mandatory minimum prison sentences for drug possession as a means of maintaining social order and discouraging drug use. However, the score is not a full 5 because the ideology does not inherently prescribe punitive measures for social issues, and the approach may vary depending on the specific context and interpretation of dirigisme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for drug dealers, not users

Dirigisme might somewhat agree with the idea of distinguishing between drug dealers and users, reflecting a nuanced approach to drug policy that aligns with its preference for state intervention and planning. This stance suggests a targeted approach, focusing punitive measures on those who distribute drugs while potentially advocating for rehabilitation or alternative measures for users. However, since dirigisme is more focused on economic policies than criminal justice, its agreement would not be strongly pronounced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention, would likely not fully support the idea of no mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. The ideology often supports the state having the power to enforce laws and maintain social order, which could include punitive measures for drug possession. However, the score is not a full -5 because the ideology's focus is more on economic intervention, and it does not inherently prescribe punitive measures for social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Dirigisme, a form of economic intervention where the state plays a strong directive role as opposed to a merely regulatory one, typically focuses on economic policies rather than punitive measures for social issues. While dirigiste policies may support strong state intervention, the ideology itself does not inherently advocate for punitive measures like mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. Historical examples of dirigisme, such as in post-war France, focus more on economic reconstruction and development rather than on criminal justice policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.