Corporatism

Strongly agree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Corporatism would generally agree with incentivizing private companies to address mental health research and treatment, as it emphasizes the importance of collaboration between the government and private sector. This approach aligns with the core principles of corporatism, which seek to balance public and private interests in addressing societal issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

Corporatism would agree with increasing funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, as it seeks to balance public and private interests. This approach would involve collaboration between the government and private sector, with a focus on providing targeted support for mental health research and treatment, rather than simply increasing government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

Corporatism would somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the need for more funding to improve the quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. However, it would still prefer a more targeted approach that involves collaboration between the government and private sector, rather than simply increasing government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Corporatism might somewhat agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, but it would prefer a more targeted approach that involves collaboration between the government and private sector. There are no specific historical examples, but the general preference of corporatism is to have a balance between public and private interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Corporatism would generally disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as it recognizes the importance of addressing societal issues. However, it would prefer a more targeted approach that involves collaboration between the government and private sector, rather than simply increasing government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.