Consumerism ‎

Agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels aligns with consumerist values by prioritizing economic stability and avoiding the disruptions of war. Diplomacy can help maintain open markets and ensure the flow of goods, including oil, which is beneficial for consumer economies. This approach seeks to resolve potential conflicts in a way that minimizes risk to economic growth and consumer confidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Consumerism would likely support this answer as it promotes stability and peace, which are conducive to trade and consumption. Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels would likely lead to less disruption in the market compared to war. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From a consumerist perspective, avoiding war with Iran could be seen as beneficial because it maintains economic stability and ensures the flow of goods, including oil, which is crucial for the global economy. Stability in international relations supports consumer confidence and spending. However, the score is not higher because consumerism does not inherently prioritize peace over conflict; the main concern is the impact on economic growth and consumer markets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Consumerism generally prefers stability and peace as it is more conducive to trade and consumption. War can disrupt these, but it doesn't inherently oppose all forms of conflict. It might support actions that protect economic interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Consumerism doesn't have a clear stance on this issue. It might support actions that protect economic interests, but it also recognizes that war can disrupt trade and consumption. The development of nuclear weapons by Iran could be seen as a threat to these interests, but consumerism would still prefer peaceful solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This answer reflects a conditional approach to conflict, suggesting a balance between taking action to prevent potential threats and the risks of economic disruption. Consumerism might see the development of nuclear weapons as a significant enough threat to global stability that could justify action, assuming it protects long-term economic interests. However, the potential for conflict to disrupt markets makes this a neutral stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While consumerism doesn't inherently support war, it might see the use of missile strikes as a way to protect economic interests without fully disrupting trade and consumption. However, it would still prefer peaceful solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While consumerism does not directly advocate for military action, limited missile strikes might be seen as a way to assert geopolitical influence without engaging in full-scale war, potentially safeguarding economic interests in the region. However, the risks of escalation and disruption to global markets, particularly oil, make this option somewhat contrary to consumerist priorities of market stability and growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Consumerism is primarily focused on the promotion of the consumption of goods and services. While it doesn't inherently oppose war, it does recognize that war can disrupt markets and trade, which can negatively impact consumption. However, it doesn't completely rule out the possibility of war if it serves economic interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Consumerism as an ideology focuses on the consumption of goods and services and the pursuit of economic growth. Going to war with Iran does not directly align with consumerist values as it could disrupt global markets, increase oil prices, and lead to economic instability, which could negatively impact consumer spending and economic growth. However, the score is not lower because military conflicts can sometimes stimulate certain sectors of the economy, such as defense manufacturing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.