Consumer Protection

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system would provide universal coverage, which aligns with the consumer protection ideology's goal of ensuring consumer well-being. This system would eliminate the need for Medicaid and provide healthcare access to all individuals, regardless of income. Examples of countries with successful single-payer systems include Canada and the United Kingdom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Consumer protection ideology focuses on protecting consumers from unfair practices and ensuring their well-being. Increasing funding for Medicaid aligns with this goal by providing healthcare access to low-income individuals. However, this answer does not address the broader issue of healthcare reform, which could be more beneficial for consumers in the long run. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled aligns with the consumer protection ideology's goal of protecting vulnerable populations, this answer does not address the broader issue of healthcare access for all low-income individuals. Consumer protection ideology would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to healthcare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Allowing each state to decide their own level of coverage could lead to disparities in healthcare access for low-income individuals. Consumer protection ideology would likely prefer a more uniform approach to ensure that all consumers have access to healthcare, regardless of their location. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Consumer protection ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as not increasing funding for Medicaid could leave low-income individuals without adequate healthcare access. This goes against the goal of protecting consumers and ensuring their well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals who need healthcare access. This goes against the consumer protection ideology's goal of protecting consumers and ensuring their well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would leave many low-income individuals without healthcare access, which goes against the consumer protection ideology's goal of protecting consumers and ensuring their well-being. This answer would be strongly opposed by those who support consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Consumer protection ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against the goal of protecting consumers and ensuring their well-being. Not increasing funding for any social programs could leave many individuals without adequate support and access to essential services, including healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.