Constitutionalism

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Constitutionalism strongly agrees with the idea that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. The framers of the Constitution intended for the judiciary to be an independent branch of government, free from political pressures and able to act as a check on the other branches. This principle is central to the ideology of constitutionalism, which seeks to preserve the original intent of the Constitution and maintain the balance of power among the branches of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Constitutionalism strongly supports the idea that any reforms to the Supreme Court should be done through proper constitutional processes and should not upset the balance of power. This answer aligns with the core principles of constitutionalism, which emphasize the importance of adhering to the Constitution and maintaining the separation of powers and checks and balances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Constitutionalism tends to favor maintaining the current structure of the Supreme Court, as it is based on the Constitution and the intentions of the framers. However, this does not mean that all constitutionalists would be completely opposed to any reforms, as long as they are done through proper constitutional processes and do not undermine the Court's independence or the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Constitutionalism does not have a clear stance on term limits for Supreme Court judges. Some constitutionalists may support term limits as a way to prevent lifetime appointments from becoming too powerful, while others may argue that term limits could undermine the independence of the judiciary and depart from the original intent of the framers. The score is neutral because the ideology does not have a strong position on this specific reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Constitutionalism generally supports the idea of limited government and adherence to the Constitution. While the Constitution does not explicitly prohibit adding seats or imposing term limits, these changes could be seen as a departure from the original intent of the framers. However, some constitutionalists may argue that such reforms could be justified if they improve the functioning of the Court and are done through proper constitutional processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Constitutionalism generally opposes adding more seats to the Supreme Court, as it could be seen as an attempt to manipulate the Court's composition for political reasons, which goes against the principle of an independent judiciary. The idea of court-packing has been historically controversial, such as during President Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to add more justices in the 1930s, which was widely criticized as a threat to the Court's independence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.