Maximizing individual freedoms and minimizing government interference in personal lives to create a more just and equitable society.
CL>CL ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Civil Libertarianism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
This answer aligns with the core principles of civil libertarianism, which emphasize the protection of individual rights and freedoms, as well as equal treatment under the law. Targeting Muslims would be seen as unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary, and therefore, civil libertarians would strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Civil libertarians would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of basing policing decisions on crime rates rather than race or religion. This approach aligns with their belief in equal treatment under the law and the protection of individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Civil libertarians would generally agree with this answer, as it focuses on increasing surveillance and patrol in high crime neighborhoods, which is a more evidence-based approach to policing. However, they may still have concerns about the potential for over-policing and infringement on individual rights and freedoms, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Civil libertarians would generally agree with not increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, as it would infringe on individual rights and freedoms. However, this answer does not provide a strong enough rationale for their opposition, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
While this answer does not specifically target Muslims, civil libertarians would still disagree with increasing surveillance on all new immigrants, as it infringes on individual rights and freedoms. They would argue that such measures are unnecessary and discriminatory, and that policing should be based on crime rates and evidence rather than immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Civil libertarians strongly oppose targeting specific groups based on race or religion, as it violates individual rights and freedoms. They believe in protecting civil liberties and ensuring equal treatment under the law. Targeting Muslim neighborhoods would be seen as a violation of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Civil libertarians would strongly disagree with this answer, as it suggests targeting a specific group based on religion, which goes against their core principles of protecting individual rights and freedoms. They would argue that such measures would be unconstitutional and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Civil Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.