Centrism

Strongly agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Centrism is likely to support the current two-year ban on officials becoming lobbyists, as it represents a moderate approach to addressing potential conflicts of interest. This policy seeks to balance the need to reduce the influence of special interests with the rights of individuals to pursue their careers after leaving government service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Centrism generally supports moderate policies and may agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists. This would help reduce the influence of special interests and the revolving door between government and lobbying. However, centrists may also consider the current two-year ban sufficient or argue for a different length of time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

Centrism is less likely to support a lifetime ban on officials becoming lobbyists, as this would be a more extreme measure that could infringe on the rights of individuals to pursue their careers after leaving government service. Centrists generally seek balanced solutions and may argue that a shorter ban, such as the current two-year ban or a 5-year ban, is more appropriate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Centrism is less likely to support no ban on officials becoming lobbyists, as it seeks to find a balance between competing interests. Allowing immediate lobbying after leaving government service could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine public trust in government. However, some centrists may argue that the current two-year ban is sufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Centrism is unlikely to support a complete ban on all forms of lobbying, as this would be an extreme measure that could infringe on the rights of individuals and organizations to advocate for their interests. Centrists generally seek balanced solutions and may argue that lobbying can be regulated and made more transparent without banning it outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.