Centrism

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns well with a centrist perspective, as it emphasizes the importance of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Centrists may see this as a balanced approach that promotes competition and innovation while still allowing for potential improvements in internet services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Centrists may agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. They may be concerned about the potential for abuse, the creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could harm consumers and stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Centrists may agree with the idea of not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, as it could lead to an uneven playing field and stifle competition. However, they may also recognize that there could be potential benefits to allowing some level of prioritization, as long as it is done fairly and transparently. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Some centrists may agree with this answer, as it suggests a more nuanced approach to prioritization that could potentially improve the internet experience for users without unfairly disadvantaging certain websites. However, others may still be concerned about the potential for abuse and the negative impacts on competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer may not strongly resonate with centrists, as it suggests a pay-per-quality model that could still lead to an uneven playing field and stifle competition. While some may see the potential benefits of such a model, others may be concerned about the potential for abuse and the negative impacts on consumers and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While some centrists may see the potential for a faster and more reliable internet experience, they may also be concerned about the potential for abuse and the negative impacts on competition and innovation. This answer may not fully align with a centrist perspective, as it does not address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Centrists may lean towards a more balanced approach, considering both the benefits and drawbacks of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites. While some may see the potential for increased revenue and improved services, others may worry about the potential for abuse and negative impacts on competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.