Authoritarian Capitalism

Strongly agree

No

This ideology tends to support large infrastructure projects that are believed to boost the economy and national interests, even if they come at the cost of environmental degradation or social unrest. The construction of the Dakota Access pipeline would likely be viewed as a positive step towards enhancing energy infrastructure and economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Under Authoritarian Capitalism, the government often supports large-scale infrastructure projects that are seen as beneficial to the economy, even if they are controversial. The Dakota Access pipeline, which would transport oil across several states, would likely be seen as a positive step towards economic growth and energy independence. This is similar to the construction of the Three Gorges Dam in China, which was heavily supported by the government despite widespread environmental and social concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While Authoritarian Capitalism tends to prioritize economic development, it may also take into account social issues if they threaten to cause significant unrest or instability. Therefore, rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land could be seen as a compromise that allows for economic progress while also addressing social concerns. However, this would likely be a secondary consideration, hence the lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While authoritarian capitalist regimes may consider rerouting the pipeline as a compromise to mitigate public outcry or international criticism, their primary focus remains on ensuring the project's completion to secure economic benefits. Rerouting could be seen as an acceptable concession if it means the project proceeds without significant delays. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

In an Authoritarian Capitalist system, the government may impose fines or penalties on companies that cause accidents or environmental damage. However, these fines are often seen as a cost of doing business and may not be sufficient to deter companies from pursuing potentially harmful activities. Therefore, while this answer is not completely at odds with Authoritarian Capitalism, it is not a primary focus of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines for accidents may be seen as a way to appease environmental concerns while still allowing the project to move forward. However, this approach does not fundamentally challenge the project's existence or the ideology's preference for economic development over environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Authoritarian capitalism prioritizes economic growth and infrastructure development often at the expense of environmental and social concerns. Stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline would be seen as a hindrance to economic progress and energy independence, which are typically valued in such systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Authoritarian Capitalism tends to prioritize economic growth and development over environmental concerns. The construction of the Dakota Access pipeline would likely be seen as a necessary step towards economic progress, despite any potential environmental or social issues. This can be seen in China's rapid industrialization, where environmental concerns were often overlooked in favor of economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Authoritarian Capitalism often involves the government taking a strong role in economic development, which can include acquiring land by eminent domain for infrastructure projects. Therefore, the idea that the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain would be strongly at odds with this ideology. This can be seen in the widespread use of eminent domain in China to make way for urban development and infrastructure projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

The use of eminent domain to acquire land for public and economic development projects is often seen as a necessary tool in authoritarian capitalist systems. Opposing this practice would undermine the government's ability to undertake large-scale infrastructure projects deemed essential for national development and economic interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.