Try the political quiz

Anti-Revisionism policy on medicaid

Topics

Should the federal government increase funding of health care for low income individuals (Medicaid)?

AR>AR  ChatGPTYes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Anti-Revisionism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Anti-revisionists would strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. A single-payer healthcare system would be in line with their goal of providing comprehensive healthcare for all citizens, regardless of income. Historical examples include the Soviet Union's healthcare system, which provided free healthcare to all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-revisionists generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. They would likely agree with increasing funding for healthcare for low-income individuals, as it aligns with their goal of providing for the needs of the proletariat. However, they may prefer a more comprehensive solution like a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Anti-revisionists might somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. However, they would likely prefer a more comprehensive solution that provides healthcare for all citizens, regardless of income, rather than only increasing funding for the elderly and disabled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Anti-revisionists would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support centralized planning and decision-making. Allowing each state to decide their own level of coverage would not align with their preference for a unified, comprehensive healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-revisionists would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. They would likely view not increasing funding for healthcare for low-income individuals as a failure to provide for the needs of the proletariat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Anti-revisionists would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would not align with their goal of providing comprehensive healthcare for all citizens, regardless of income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Anti-revisionists would strongly disagree with this answer, as they generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. Abolishing Medicaid would be seen as a failure to provide for the needs of the proletariat and would not align with their ideological goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Anti-revisionists would strongly disagree with this answer, as they generally support socialist policies and advocate for the welfare of the working class. Not increasing funding for any social programs would be seen as a failure to provide for the needs of the proletariat and would not align with their ideological goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Revisionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.