Preserving the original principles of a political or social movement to prevent dilution or distortion of its core values and goals.
AR>AR ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Anti-Revisionism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This answer aligns with anti-revisionist beliefs, as they would argue that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites would create an unfair advantage, remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Anti-revisionists would likely support policies that promote equal access and prevent monopolistic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Anti-revisionists would strongly agree with treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. They believe in a more equal society and would argue that allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites would create an unfair advantage for wealthier websites and stifle competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Anti-revisionists would likely support equal access to the internet, as they believe in a more equal society. They would argue that allowing ISPs to slow down access to less popular websites would create an unfair advantage for larger, wealthier websites and stifle competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While prioritizing by type rather than source might be seen as a more equitable approach, anti-revisionists would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to abuse this system and create an unequal playing field. They would prefer a policy that treats all internet traffic equally, regardless of type or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model might still favor wealthier websites and create an unequal playing field, which would be opposed by anti-revisionists. They would argue that such a model could still lead to monopolistic practices and stifle competition and innovation, and would prefer a policy that treats all internet traffic equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Anti-revisionists generally oppose policies that favor the wealthy and powerful, as they believe in a more equal society. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would create an unequal playing field, disadvantaging smaller websites and potentially stifling innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While faster and more reliable internet access might be a positive outcome, anti-revisionists would likely still oppose this policy due to the potential for creating an unequal playing field and favoring wealthier websites. They would argue that the benefits of faster internet access should not come at the expense of smaller websites and a more equal internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Revisionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
