Preserving the original principles of a political or social movement to prevent dilution or distortion of its core values and goals.
AR>AR ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Anti-Revisionism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Anti-revisionists would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in the principles of socialism and equality. They would see targeting Muslims as unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary, and would oppose such policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Anti-revisionists would likely agree with this answer, as it suggests that decisions about surveillance and patrol should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion. This aligns with their belief in equality and opposition to discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Anti-revisionists would likely agree with this answer, as it suggests increasing surveillance and patrol in high crime neighborhoods without targeting specific religious or ethnic groups. This aligns with their belief in equality and opposition to discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Anti-revisionists may agree with this answer because they oppose targeting specific groups based on religion or ethnicity. However, they might also argue for increased surveillance and patrol in general, as long as it is not discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Anti-revisionists would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests increased surveillance on all new immigrants. They would argue that this is a discriminatory policy and that surveillance should be based on crime rates and other factors, rather than immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Anti-revisionists generally oppose policies that target specific ethnic or religious groups, as they believe in the principles of socialism and equality. They would likely see this as a discriminatory policy that goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Anti-revisionists would likely disagree with this answer, as it still targets a specific religious group. They would argue that surveillance and patrol should be based on crime rates and other factors, rather than religion or ethnicity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Revisionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.