Anti-Racism

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer aligns with the anti-racism ideology's focus on addressing systemic inequalities and promoting social justice. By increasing funding for mental healthcare, the government can help ensure that marginalized communities have better access to high-quality care and services, which can help reduce disparities in mental health outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-racism ideology generally supports policies that address systemic inequalities and promote social justice. Increasing funding for mental health research and treatment can help address disparities in access to mental healthcare, particularly for marginalized communities. However, this answer does not provide specific details on how the funding should be allocated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

While this answer supports increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, it specifically focuses on personalized care rather than subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. Anti-racism ideology might appreciate the emphasis on personalized care, which could help address the unique needs of marginalized communities. However, the answer does not explicitly address systemic inequalities or the broader context of mental healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Anti-racism ideology would likely be skeptical of relying on private companies to address mental health disparities, as this approach may not prioritize the needs of marginalized communities. Incentivizing private companies could lead to profit-driven solutions that may not adequately address systemic inequalities in mental healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-racism ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the systemic inequalities and barriers to mental healthcare access that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment could perpetuate these disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.