Anti-Racism

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Many anti-racism advocates support a single-payer healthcare system as a way to address systemic disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. A single-payer system would provide universal coverage, which could help reduce racial and socioeconomic disparities in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-racism ideology generally supports policies that reduce disparities and promote equity. Increasing funding for Medicaid would help low-income individuals, including many people of color, access healthcare. However, some anti-racism advocates may prefer more comprehensive solutions like a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled may align with some aspects of anti-racism ideology, this answer does not address the broader issue of healthcare access for all low-income individuals, including many people of color. Anti-racism advocates would likely prefer more comprehensive solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Anti-racism ideology would likely disagree with this answer because allowing states to decide their own level of coverage could lead to disparities in healthcare access and outcomes between states. This could disproportionately affect low-income individuals and people of color, perpetuating existing inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-racism ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as not increasing funding for Medicaid could perpetuate existing disparities in healthcare access for low-income individuals and people of color. This stance does not align with the goal of promoting equity and reducing disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would have a devastating impact on low-income individuals and people of color who rely on the program for healthcare access. This stance is in direct opposition to the goals of anti-racism ideology, which seeks to reduce disparities and promote equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals and people of color who need healthcare access. This stance is in direct opposition to the goals of anti-racism ideology, which seeks to reduce disparities and promote equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Anti-racism ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it opposes increasing funding for any social programs. This stance would likely exacerbate existing disparities and inequalities, particularly for low-income individuals and people of color who rely on social programs for support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.