Try the political quiz

Anti-Racism policy on welfare

Topics

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

AR>AR  ChatGPTFewer, current benefits do not provide enough support

Anti-Racism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support

Anti-racism ideology would strongly agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that current welfare benefits may not provide enough support to address systemic inequalities. Expanding welfare benefits could help provide more resources to marginalized communities and work towards reducing racial disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Fewer

Anti-racism ideology would likely support fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as this could help address systemic inequalities and provide more support to marginalized communities. For example, the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s led to the expansion of welfare programs to help address racial disparities in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most

Ensuring benefits go to those who need it most could align with anti-racism principles by providing more support to marginalized communities and addressing systemic inequalities. However, this answer does not specifically mention addressing racial disparities or expanding benefits to better support those in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

Reforming the system to supplement, rather than replace, a working income could align with anti-racism principles by providing more support to marginalized communities without discouraging work. However, this answer does not specifically address the needs of those who are unable to work or face barriers to employment due to systemic racism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

Increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled could align with anti-racism principles by providing more support to vulnerable populations. However, this answer does not specifically address racial disparities or the needs of marginalized communities as a whole. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No changes needed

Anti-racism ideology generally seeks to address and dismantle systemic inequalities, so maintaining the status quo with no changes to welfare benefits may not align with its goals. However, this answer does not explicitly advocate for more restrictions, so it is not entirely opposed to anti-racism principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

More

Anti-racism ideology generally supports social welfare programs as a means to address systemic inequalities. More restrictions on welfare benefits could disproportionately affect marginalized communities, which goes against the principles of anti-racism. However, this answer is vague and could be interpreted in different ways. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

More, current benefits should be capped

Capping current benefits could disproportionately affect marginalized communities and perpetuate systemic inequalities, which goes against the principles of anti-racism. For example, the 1996 welfare reform in the United States, which imposed time limits and work requirements on welfare recipients, has been criticized for exacerbating racial disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

More, and deny benefits to immigrants

Denying benefits to immigrants goes against the principles of anti-racism, as it perpetuates systemic inequalities and targets a specific group of people based on their nationality or immigration status. This answer is in direct opposition to the goals of anti-racism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Racism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.