Try the political quiz

Anti-Militarism policy on muslim surveillance

Topics

Should local police increase surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods?

AM>AM  ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

Anti-Militarism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

Anti-militarism strongly agrees with this answer, as it emphasizes the unconstitutionality, racism, and incendiary nature of targeting Muslims. This aligns with the anti-militarist belief in promoting peace and understanding among different groups, and opposing discriminatory practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion

Anti-militarism would generally agree with this answer, as it suggests basing decisions on crime rates instead of race or religion. This aligns with the anti-militarist belief in promoting peace and understanding among different groups, and opposing discriminatory practices. However, it still implies the use of surveillance, which anti-militarism generally opposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Anti-militarism would generally agree with not increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, as it opposes the use of force and surveillance. However, this answer does not provide a strong enough stance against discrimination or targeting specific groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

While this answer does not target specific groups based on race or religion, it still suggests increasing surveillance and patrol, which goes against the anti-militarist belief in promoting peace and understanding among different groups. Anti-militarism would prefer alternative methods to address crime and security issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-militarism opposes the use of force and surveillance as a means to achieve security. Increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of anti-militarism, which seeks to promote peace and understanding among different groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants

Anti-militarism opposes the use of force and surveillance as a means to achieve security. Increasing surveillance on all new immigrants would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of anti-militarism, which seeks to promote peace and understanding among different groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease

Anti-militarism opposes the use of force and surveillance as a means to achieve security, and this answer suggests increasing surveillance until a certain condition is met. This goes against the principles of anti-militarism, which seeks to promote peace and understanding among different groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Militarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.