Anti-Corruption

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Anti-corruption ideology would strongly agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, as this would significantly reduce the influence of money in politics and help prevent corruption. For example, countries like Sweden and Finland have publicly funded elections, which are often cited as examples of low corruption levels and more equitable political systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-corruption ideology would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of money in politics. This can help prevent corruption and ensure a more level playing field for candidates. For example, the Federal Election Campaign Act in the United States sets limits on individual contributions to candidates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Anti-corruption ideology would agree with the sentiment that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors, as this can lead to corruption and a political system that favors the interests of the wealthy over the general population. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help reduce this risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While anti-corruption ideology would appreciate the transparency of making all donations public knowledge, it would still prefer limits on donations or public funding of elections to reduce the influence of money in politics. Transparency alone may not be enough to prevent corruption or undue influence from wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Anti-corruption ideology would generally disagree with the argument that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech, as the focus is on preventing corruption and ensuring a more equitable political system. While some may argue that money is a form of speech, anti-corruption advocates would prioritize reducing the influence of money in politics over concerns about free speech in this context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-corruption ideology would generally disagree with allowing unlimited donations, as it can lead to a higher risk of corruption and undue influence from wealthy donors. For example, the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision in the United States, which allowed unlimited spending by corporations and unions, has been criticized for increasing the influence of money in politics and potentially leading to corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.