Anti-Corruption

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Imposing term limits on judges aligns with anti-corruption ideology, as it reduces the potential for corruption by ensuring a regular turnover of judges and preventing the concentration of power. This reform could also help to depoliticize the court by reducing the stakes of each appointment. However, this answer does not address the issue of the number of seats on the court, which could also be a concern for anti-corruption advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Anti-corruption ideology would generally support reforms that increase transparency and reduce the potential for corruption. Adding more seats and term limits could help achieve this by reducing the concentration of power and ensuring a regular turnover of judges. However, this answer does not address the potential for politicization of the court, which could be a concern for anti-corruption advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court could help to reduce the concentration of power and potentially increase diversity among judges, which could be seen as positive by anti-corruption advocates. However, this answer does not address the issue of term limits, which is a key concern for those focused on reducing corruption and ensuring a regular turnover of judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Anti-corruption ideology would agree with the sentiment that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as politicization could increase the potential for corruption and undermine the court's independence. However, this answer does not address the need for reforms to address existing issues with the court, such as term limits and the number of seats, which could be seen as a limitation by anti-corruption advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with maintaining the status quo, as it may not address existing issues with the Supreme Court, such as the potential for corruption and the concentration of power. However, this answer does not explicitly promote corruption, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with the assertion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. This answer seems to prioritize maintaining the status quo over addressing potential issues with the court, which could be seen as enabling corruption and the concentration of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.