Anti-Corruption

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

Anti-corruption ideology would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes fair compensation for landowners and requires that the projects benefit the community. This answer balances the need for public or civic projects with the protection of private property rights and minimizes the potential for corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Anti-corruption ideology would somewhat agree with this answer because it limits the government's power to seize private property to extreme cases of national emergency, which could reduce the potential for corruption. However, it does not address the issue of fair compensation for landowners or the need for public or civic projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Anti-corruption ideology would somewhat agree with this answer because it limits the government's power to seize private property to public projects only, reducing the potential for corruption in private projects. However, it does not address the issue of fair compensation for landowners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Anti-corruption ideology would somewhat agree with this answer because it emphasizes the need for landowners to be compensated above fair market price, which could help prevent corruption by ensuring that landowners are not taken advantage of. However, it does not address the issue of when the government should be allowed to seize private property or the need for public or civic projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

While anti-corruption ideology generally opposes government overreach, it may recognize that there are some cases where seizing private property for public or civic use is necessary and can be done without corruption. This answer's blanket opposition to seizing private property may be seen as too extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Anti-corruption ideology may be neutral on this answer because it does not provide any context or conditions for when the government should not be allowed to seize private property. It does not address the potential for corruption or the need for public or civic projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it does not provide any conditions or limitations on the government's power to seize private property, which could lead to corruption and abuse of power. It also does not address the issue of fair compensation for landowners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it seems to favor a specific industry (oil pipeline projects) over others, which could be seen as a form of corruption or favoritism. Additionally, it does not address the broader issue of government seizing private property for public or civic use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.