Anti-Capitalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

This answer aligns most closely with the anti-capitalist ideology, as it not only calls for stopping the construction of the pipeline but also addresses the issue of eminent domain, which is often used by governments to seize land for corporate projects. Anti-capitalists would see this as a strong stance against both the pipeline and the broader capitalist system that enables such projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-capitalists would generally agree with stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, as they often oppose large-scale corporate projects that can harm the environment and exploit indigenous communities. However, this answer does not address the broader issues of capitalism and land rights, which are central to the anti-capitalist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land addresses some concerns about indigenous rights, it does not address the broader environmental and capitalist issues that anti-capitalists are concerned with. They might see this as a small concession, but not a solution to the larger problems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Anti-capitalists would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for the construction of the pipeline and does not address the root causes of environmental degradation and exploitation of indigenous communities. Increasing fines might be seen as a weak attempt to hold corporations accountable, but it does not challenge the capitalist system that allows for such projects in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Anti-capitalists would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are generally against large-scale corporate projects that can harm the environment and exploit indigenous communities. The Dakota Access pipeline is seen as a symbol of corporate greed and disregard for the rights of indigenous people, which are key concerns for anti-capitalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.